Venue: Council Chamber, Allerdale House. View directions
Contact: Kathryn Magnay Email: kathryn.magnay@allerdale.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
To sign as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 15 February 2022 Minutes: The minutes of the meeting on 15 February 2022 were signed as a correct record. |
|
Declaration of Interests Councillors/Staff to give notice of any disclosable pecuniary interest, other registrable interest or any other interest and the nature of that interest relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the adopted Code of Conduct. Minutes: Councillor N Cockburn declared an interest in item 5 - FUL/2021/0070; Councillor N Cockburn has attended lots of meetings and consultations regarding Derwent Forest and part of Derwent Forest is in her ward, however this will not affect her ability in the decision-making.
Councillor D Horsley declared an interest in item 5 – FUL/2021/0070; part of Derwent Forest is in his ward, however, this will not affect his ability in the decision-making.
|
|
Questions To answer questions from Councillors and members of the public – submitted in writing or by electronic mail no later than 5.00pm on a working day, allowing two clear working days before the day of the meeting.
Minutes: None received. |
|
FUL/2021/0070 - Derwent Forest - Residential Development (71 Dwellings) Minutes: Representations
Stephen Murray and Martin Lankester spoke in objection to the application.
Christine Hardman spoke in support of the application.
The Agent, Peter Shannon spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Senior Planning Officer, Steve Long recommended to grant the application subject to no objections from Natural England to an assessment under the Habitats regulations and S106 legal agreement.
The Senior Planning Officer reported reference to the late list document, additional plans had been received which all match each other and further representations had been received from Seaton Parish Council highlighting their previous concerns on the potential traffic impacts.
The Senior Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
· Principle of Development
The scheme as amended is acceptable in accordance with the objectives of Policy S18 of ALLP1. The proposal will deliver beneficial local connectivity and restoration measures, proportionate to the scale of the development proposed.
· Layout and Scale
As amended, the major development proposed seeks to reflect the house style concepts of the original development and be sympathetic with its open countryside setting. The nearest property is approx. 260m distance from the site. A Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) has been submitted for the development
· Highways
The layout and access details as amended meet the requirements of the County highway authority. In order to improve connectivity, the scheme incorporates the extension of the existing C2C route which lies to the west of the site, across the site to the Broughton Moor/ Gt Broughton highway as well as the estate itself. The issue of the C2C extension has been confirmed by the applicant as to be Multiuser i.e. available for additional use by horse riders. The applicant has provided details for the Construction Traffic Management Plan.
· Education
The securing of the enhanced education infrastructure/ transport services has been assessed with the County Education department. The scheme was amended to deliver all primary/ junior education contributions to the academy at Gt Broughton (£250,000) as unlike Broughton Moor there is already the bulk of an existing pedestrian footway link to this settlement, which would be completed as part of the development. In terms of secondary school education contributions, the County agreed to amend their recommendation to deliver the secondary education element to Maryport rather than Cockermouth School as it is nearer and has spare capacity, however would be subject to the provision of a (£71,250) contribution for transport. The applicant has provided a timetable for the submissions of these sums which has been accepted by the County.
· Contamination
The bespoke Policy S18 of ALPP1 relating to this specific Derwent Forest site seeks a form of enabling development (e.g. residential) to facilitate the clean-up of the site. Policy S30 also endorses the remediation of existing contaminated land/buildings. There has been detailed examination of the historical legacy of the site and its operations, to establish the extent of this constraint. The proposal includes the removal and restoration of the southern section of the former munition site, with the relocation of the existing perimeter fence alongside the revised route of the C2C. · Affordable Housing The proposed scheme as amended will deliver 20% local affordable home ownership housing quota (14 dwellings) required under the provisions of Policy SA3 of ALLP2 to be secured under the S106. · Drainage The foul and surface water drainage details are acceptable in compliance with policy S29 of ALPP1 · Ecology
Policy S35 refers to ecology/ biodiversity. The application is supported by detailed ecological surveys. Subject to mitigation being secured these details are safeguarded. A habitat regulation assessment (HRA) for the proposed works has been received. Following member discussions, Councillor A Semple proposed to refuse the application doesn’t deliver the vision or comply with Policy S18. Councillor N Cockburn seconded the motion and to include policy S22. Planning Manager Graeme Law advised members they need to be clear and concise with the wording for the motion. Motion Reason 1: The proposal is contrary to Local Plan Policy S18 (Derwent Forest) in that it fails to adequately demonstrate a viable mix of uses to enable the restoration of the whole Derwent Forest site. As a piecemeal proposal covering only one part of the allocated Derwent Forest site, it fails to adequately meet the criteria of the policy and in particular fails to: a) Produce a comprehensive masterplan for the site as part of the planning application. (The applicants ‘masterplan’ is not comprehensive, failing to provide appropriate triggers and thresholds, without clear mechanism for verall delivery). b) Ensure that off-site infrastructure is adequate to accommodate the overall proposals for the site.
Reason 2: The proposal is contrary to Local Plan Policy S22 (Transport Principles) in that it fails to adequately demonstrate that it meets the transport principles of the Local Plan both for the specific proposal and for the masterplan required under Policy S22 (Derwent Forest).
The proposal is therefore contrary to the Development Plan, no material planning considerations have been identified to justify departure from the Development Plan; consequently the proposal fails to balance Economic, Environmental and Community objectives as set out in the government’s NPPF guidance and is therefore not sustainable development.
A vote was taken: 11 voted in favour of refusal and 1 against. The motion in favour of refusal was carried. Decision Refused
|
|
Minutes: Representations
Bill Finlay and Christine Steele spoke in objection to the application.
The Planning Officer read out an email on behalf of Andrew Fielding and Vanessa Sonnabend these were in objection to the application.
The Agent, Anthea Jones spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Planning Officer, Kerry McCartney recommended to refuse the application.
The Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
· Principle of Development
The proposal site it situated within the village of Hayton which is specified in the Local Plan (part 1) as an infill/rounding off village. Part 2 of the Local Plan omits any settlement limits for the village. The merits of the principle of the development therefore fundamentally relate to whether, physically, the plot itself constitutes an infill or rounding off plot. It is the opinion of officers that this site does not fall into this category. The proposal is therefore considered contrary to Policy S3 of the Allerdale Local Plan.
· Highways
Cumbria Highways have raised no objections to the proposal subject to conditions relating to visibility splays and construction and drainage specification details for the access area. The proposal is therefore considered acceptable in terms of highway considerations.
· Amenity
It is considered that the development site is of significant distance to neighbouring properties to overcome any potential amenity issues and any amenity issues would be addressed as part of any future reserved matters application.
· Heritage
The site falls just outside of the Hayton Conservation Area, however the access road is within. The application site is located within Hadrian’s Wall World Heritage Site Buffer Zone and is also adjacent to a Listed Building (The Chapel) directly to the right of the access track. It is considered that a development of one residential dwelling could be achieved without resulting in detriment to the above assets. · Drainage
A drainage report has been submitted with the application which are considered satisfactory for the development. Following member discussions, Councillor N Cockburn proposed to refuse the application as per officers recommendations. Councillor R Munby seconded the motion. Councillor C Armstrong requested a recorded vote. A vote was taken on the request for a recorded vote, which was approved.
A recorded vote was taken on the Motion, viz. –
In favour:
Councillors T Annison, C Armstrong, N Cockburn, A Daniels, J Farebrother, D Horsley, C McCarron-Holmes, A McGuckin, R Munby, P Scott, A Semple and A Tyson
12 voted in favour of refusal The motion in favour of refusal was carried. Decision Refused
|
|
Break for Lunch 12:40 - 13:30 |
|
Councillor McCarron-Holmes and Councillor Munby left the meeting |
|
Minutes: Representations
The Applicant, Matthew Atkinson spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Senior Planning Officer, Rebecca Wilson recommended to refuse the application.
The Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
· Principle of Development
Policy S3 and S31 of the Local Plan (Part 1) supports the reuse of rural buildings in the open countryside. Officers are satisfied that the building is capable of conversion and the principle of conversion can be supported. However, concern is raised with regards to the new build element that would significantly alter the footprint of the development contrary to Policies S14 and S31 of the Local Plan (Part 1).
· Demolition and Biodiversity
The scale of the small lean to element on the southern elevation offers little character to the site or visual amenity to the area and no objections are raised to its demolition. The applicant has adequately addressed the proposal is acceptable in terms of impact on protected species in line with Policy S35 subject to mitigations measures which can be secured by condition.
· Design
Officers consider the proposed alterations and extension to the building, in the form of the scale of the two storey extension, addition of a balcony at first floor level and the use of inappropriate materials are inappropriate for its rural location and fails to respond positively to the character and history of the existing resulting in a development that would adversely alter the appearance of the existing building contrary to Polices S3, S31 and DM15 of the Allerdale Local Plan.
Following member discussions, Councillor C Armstrong proposed to defer the application for further communication between the officers and the applicant to draw together the council’s policy and the applicant’s requirements. Councillor P Scott seconded the motion. A vote was taken: the vote for deferral was unanimous.
The motion in favour of deferral was carried. Decision Deferred
|
|
FUL/2021/0013 - Gale Brow - Caravan Development Minutes: Representations
The Agent, Richard Lindsay spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Senior Planning Officer, Rebecca Wilson recommended to approve the application subject to the conditions in the report and in addition, condition 8 has been revised, additional conditions 25, 26 and 27 have been added.
The Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
· Background
The site has been used for mixed purposes and has a varied planning history. Inspectors comments in relation to recent planning appeals for tourism accommodation at the site have suggested that the main area of concern for tourism development related to landscape impact.
· Principle
Inspectors comments in relation to recent planning appeals found the site to have accessible access to facilities. The site is brownfield and is well related to the local transport network. Despite conflict with Planning Policy SA32 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 2) July 2020, it is recognised that the development would bring about a cohesive use for the previously developed site in place of the existing mixed uses and would bring about some benefits to the local economy.
· Landscape
The application is accompanied by a Landscape Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) and landscaping scheme to mitigate against any adverse impacts which would be brought about by the development. Appropriately worded conditions can be used to safeguard the landscaping plan and ensure mitigation for the development.
· Highways
Cumbria highways object to the proposal due to the absence of specified visibility splays from the existing access. It is considered that refusal of the application on these grounds would be unwarranted given the limited use of the access road by vehicular traffic, the likely low speed of such traffic and that the access is an existing access in use at the site.
· Residential Amenity
The development would bring about a low density lodge site, separated from adjacent properties. Conditions are suggested to ensure the residential amenity of neighbouring properties is safeguarded.
· Drainage
Suitable drainage can be secured by condition.
· Contamination
Conditions in relation to contamination are required.
· Ecology
Further ecology survey works prior to demolition of existing buildings can be secured by planning condition.
Following member discussions, Councillor T Annison proposed to approve the application as per officers recommendations and the conditions. Councillor C Armstrong seconded the motion. A vote was taken: the vote for approval was unanimous.
The motion in favour of approval l was carried. Decision Approved Conditions
Reason: In order to comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
Location Plan received 26th January 2022 Brochure detail for lodges Drwg No: 01003 Rev:01 - Section through proposed entrance Drwg No: 01002 Rev:01 – Proposed works to existing entrance Plan of buildings to be demolished Drawing number D/01 – Paving details WW/10B Rev B – Landscape Sections WW/L01 Rev J – Outline Landscape Plan WW/L01 Rev F - Planting Plan Reason: In order to ensure that the development is carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans and any material and non-material alterations to the scheme are properly considered.
3. Prior to the commencement of demolition works on site, details of a bat emergence survey, a dawn survey or automated bat survey and further internal and external inspection by a qualified consultant shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Any approved mitigation measures shall be fully implemented in accordance with the approved detailed scheme. Reason: To safeguard any potential bat species during construction works at the application site, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework, Policy S35 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: In order to ensure that adequate protection is afforded to the existing trees on the site.
Reason: In order to enhance the appearance of the development and minimise the impact of the development in the locality.
6. A landscaping management plan including long term design objectives, management responsibilities and maintenance schedules for all landscaped areas shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority prior to operation. The development shall thereafter be maintained at all times in accordance with the approved landscaping management plan. Reason: To ensure the long term maintenance and management of the landscaping for the development in the open countryside in compliance with Policies S32 and S33 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: In the interests of and to protect surrounding visual amenity.
Reason: The Local Planning Authority would wish to carefully examine the use of the building other than for holiday accommodation to assess whether it would be acceptable in terms of location, access and amenity, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and Policies S2, S3, S32 and S33 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014 and Policy SA2 of the Allerdale Local Plan Part 2 adopted Sept 2020.
Reason: The Local Planning Authority would wish to carefully examine the use of the building other than for holiday accommodation to assess whether it would be acceptable in terms of location, access and amenity, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S17 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To safeguard the amenity of nearby residential properties, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S32 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: In order to ensure a satisfactory standard of development for the external appearance of the approved scheme in relation to its surroundings, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy DM14 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory standard of development which is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and safeguard the amenity of neighbouring properties.
Reason: To ensure that works are carried out to a suitable level in relation to the adjoining properties and highways and in the interest of visual amenity.
Reason: To promote sustainable development, secure proper drainage and to manage the risk of flooding and pollution.
15.Prior to the commencement of works, details of the non-mains foul drainage systems for the development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development hereby permitted shall only be carried out in accordance with the approved non-mains drainage assessment including the following specific mitigation measures detailed therein : a. Soakaways to be constructed to BS6297:2007 b. No connection to watercourse or land drainage system and no part of the soakaway system is within 10 metres of any ditch or watercourse. c. No siting of the septic tank/package sewage treatment plant within 50 metres or upslope of any well, spring or borehole used for private water supply. The details hereby approved shall be implemented prior to the use of the development. Reason: To enable a satisfactory means of non-mains foul drainage, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy DM12 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Traffic Management Plan to include all traffic associated with the development, including site and staff traffic, off site parking, turning and compound areas; a. Procedure to monitor and mitigate noise and vibration from the construction and demolition and to monitor any properties at risk of damage from vibration, as well as taking into account noise from vehicles, deliveries. All measurements should make reference to BS7445. b. Mitigation measures to reduce adverse impacts on residential properties from construction compounds including visual impact, noise, and light pollution. c. A written procedure for dealing with complaints regarding the construction or demolition; d. Measures to control the emissions of dust and dirt during construction and demolition (including any wheel washing facilities); e. Programme of work for Demolition and Construction phase; f. Hours of working and deliveries; g. Details of lighting to be used on site; h. Highway signage/ Haulage routes. The approved statement shall be adhered to throughout the duration of the development. Reason: In the interests of safeguarding the amenity of the occupiers of neighbouring properties during the construction works of the development hereby approved, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S32 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014 and in the interests of highway safety.
Reason: To minimise any risk during or post construction works arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S30 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To minimise any risk during or post construction works arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S30 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To minimise any risk during or post construction works arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S30 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To minimise any risk arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S30 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
21.The access drive shall be surfaced in bituminous or cement bound materials, or otherwise bound and shall be constructed and completed before the development is brought into use. This surfacing shall extend for a distance of at least 5 metres inside the site, as measured from the carriageway edge of the adjacent highway. Reason: In the interests of highway safety and environmental management.
22.The use of the development shall not be commenced until the access has been formed to give a minimum width of 4.8 metres, and that part of the access road extending 10 metres into the site from the existing highway has been constructed in accordance with details approved by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of highway safety and environmental management.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety for the visibility of construction and operational traffic using the approved access.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety and environmental management.
25.Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority all holiday units shall be sited entirely in accordance with drawing WW/L01 Rev J Gale Brow Winscales Outline Landscape Plan received 20 January 2022 and no more than 12 holiday units plus 1 Manager’s lodge shall be sited within the development as hereby approved. Reason: In order to minimise the visual impact of the development in the locality in compliance with Policies S2, S32 and S33 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
26.Prior to occupation of any lodge, details of the pitch of the Manager’s Lodge shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Manager’s lodge shall thereafter be solely occupied by the site Manager or dependants of such persons residing with him or her, or a widow or widower of such persons and shall be removed from the site on cessation of the holiday use of the lodge site as approved. Reason: To ensure that non-essential residential development in the open countryside is removed from the site on cessation of the holiday use in accordance with Policy S3 Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014 and Policy SA2 of the Allerdale Local Plan Part 2 adopted Sept 2020. 27.The lodges hereby approved shall be used for holiday let accommodation (except the Manger’s Lodge) and for no other purpose (including any other purpose in Class C of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning [Use Classes] Order 2015), or in any provision equivalent to that Class in any statutory instrument revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification. Reason: The Local Planning Authority would wish to examine the use of the building other than for holiday accommodation to assess whether it would be acceptable in terms of location, access and amenity, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy SA32 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted Sept 2020.
|