Venue: Council Chamber, Allerdale House. View directions
Contact: Kathryn Magnay 01900 702635
No. | Item |
---|---|
To sign as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 12 December 2017, 19 December 2017 and 9 January 2018 Additional documents:
Minutes: The minutes of the meetings held on 12 December 2017, 19 December 2017 and 9 January 2018 were signed as correct records. |
|
Declaration of Interests Councillors/Staff to give notice of any disclosable pecuniary interest, other registrable interest or any other interest and the nature of that interest relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the adopted Code of Conduct. Minutes: None declared. |
|
Questions To answer questions from Councillors and members of the public – submitted in writing or by electronic mail no later than 5.00pm, 2 working days before the meeting. Minutes: None received. |
|
Minutes: Representations
Christopher Storey spoke in objection to the application.
The agent, Daniel Addis and the applicant, Kevin Thompson spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Principal Planning Officer recommended approval.
The Principal Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
Officers consider insufficient information has been provided to justify the location of the building in an isolated location detached from the main farmstead.
Due to the location of the access track adjacent to an open boundary with the adjacent property “Holroyd” officers consider the proposal with impact on the amenity currently enjoyed by this property.
Cumbria Highways consider the proposed access is acceptable from a highway perspective.
Members noted the representations received in respect of the application, the main grounds of which were set out in the report.
Councillor N Cockburn moved that the application be refused as per the recommendations from officers. This was seconded by Councillor B Miskelly.
A vote was taken on the motion. The vote in favour of refusal was unanimous. The motion was carried.
Decision
Refused
Reasons
|
|
Minutes: Representations
The agent, Margaret Hardy and the applicant, Nick Bailey spoke in support of the application.
Application
The Planning Officer recommended approval.
The Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
Established at outline stage with extant consent 2/2012/0784 for 50 dwellings subject to a Section 106 Agreement for 30% affordable housing (12 dwellings) and contributions to education and transport. The site is classed as a ‘commitment’ within the Preferred Options document associated with Part 2 of the Allerdale Local Plan. Brigham as a settlement is categorised as a Local Service Centre. Villages within that part of the settlement hierarchy are expected to in combination, achieve 20% of the housing growth for the district.
This application seeks a variation of the original outline consent to reduce the site capacity to 40 dwellings with an amended drainage strategy providing off-site drainage that will benefit the local area. The layout is no longer a reserved matter.
The applicant also seeks a variation of the Section 106 regarding a reduced number of affordable housing (8 dwellings) being a 20% provision. Contributions to education and transport are also to be omitted and deemed unnecessary by the County Council. A Financial Viability Assessment has been provided and assessed by the Council’s consultant to justify matters in favour of the applicant’s proposals.
The application now commits to a layout of 40 dwellings that is acceptable in all respects and includes appropriate levels of open space and parking provision to meet Highway Authority parking standards.
A comprehensive attenuated drainage strategy has been provided with an outfall to Kirkcross Quarry Pond and onward to the River Derwent. The off-site drainage solution offered by the applicant takes surface water from lower Brigham via the Lime Kiln pond known as ‘The Cut’ and combined with the development site drainage. This brings significant community benefits, helps to safeguard the development itself from flooding and is the key factor regarding the planning balance against providing alternative benefits of, education and transport contributions.
The outline approval will trigger the reserved matters application currently under consideration by the Council regarding precise design and appearance of the house types. An indicative schedule of house types has been provided that are considered satisfactory in all respects and achievable at this site.
Members noted the representations received in respect of the application, the main grounds of which were set out in the report.
Councillor M Grainger moved that the application be approved as per the recommendations from officers. This was seconded by Councillor T Annison.
A vote was taken on the motion. The vote in favour of approval was unanimous. The motion was carried.
Decision
Approved
Conditions
Reason: In order to comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
11-18-01a - Site Location Plan 1718-216A - Site Layout (26/10/2017) Email dated 12/11/2012 Regarding revised proposal description confirming reserved matters Environmental Risk Assessment EES09-29 dated 29/5/2009 Ground Gas Assessment EES09-29 dated 23/7/2009 Risk Management Strategy EES12-099 dated 19/9/2012 Noise Assessment Report KDL/KB/NA/10/12 dated 19/10/2012 Tree Survey EESS09-29 dated 29/5/2009 Phase 1 Habitat Survey EES09-29 dated 29/5/2009 Environmental Documents Updates Statement EES12-099 dated 19/9/2012 Transport Statement A078102 dated August 2012 Travel Plan A078102 dated September 2012 Technical Note A66 Junction Capacity Assessment A078102 dated December 2012 (amendment received 10/12/2012 Drainage Statement RO/11058.6 Version 9 11058 001 B - Engineering layout 11058 200 D - Proposed drainage layout sheet 1 of 2 11058 201 B - Propsed drainage layout sheet 2 of 2 11058 202 B - Adoptable manhole Schedule 11058 203 A - Adoptable manhole 1:20 details sheet 1 of 2 11058 204 A - Adoptable manhole 1:20 details Sheet 2 of 2 11058 701 A - Proposed Drainage Construction details 11058 208 Rev C Off Site Drainage Layout 11058 C1001 Rev A Outfall Proposal H40CA Proposed Headwall
Reason: In order to ensure that the development is carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans and any material and non-material alterations to the scheme are properly considered.
Reason: In order to comply with Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Reason: To ensure a minimum standard of construction in the interests of highway safety.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety.
Reason: To ensure a suitable standard of crossing for pedestrian safety.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety.
Reason: To avoid vehicles entering or leaving the site by an unsatisfactory access or route, in the interests of road safety.
Reason: The carrying out of this development without the provision of these facilities likely to lead to inconvenience and danger to road users.
Reason: The carrying out of this development without the provision of these facilities during the construction work is likely to lead to inconvenience and danger to road users.
Reason: To ensure a minimum standard of access provision when the development is brought into use.
Reason: To aid in the delivery of sustainable transport objectives.
Reason: To ensure a sustainable means of drainage from the site and minimise the risk of water pollution to the local water environment.
(a) Traffic Management Plan to include all traffic associated with the development, including site and staff traffic; (b) Procedure to monitor and mitigate noise and vibration from the construction and demolition and to monitor any properties at risk of damage from vibration, as well as taking into account noise from vehicles, deliveries. All measurements should make reference to BS7445; (c) Mitigation measures to reduce adverse impacts on residential properties from construction compounds including visual impact, noise, and light pollution; (d) A written procedure for dealing with complaints regarding the construction or demolition; (e) Measures to control the emissions of dust and dirt during construction and demolition; (f) Programme of work for Demolition and Construction phase; (g) Hours of working and deliveries; (h) Details of lighting to be used on site.
Reason: In the interests of the amenity of the occupiers of neighbouring properties.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory standard of housing development safeguarding residential amenity.
Reason: To minimise any risk arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment.
Reason: To minimise any risk arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment.
Reason: To minimise any risk arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment.
Reason: In order to enhance the appearance of the development and minimise the impact of the development in the locality and to safeguard and promote biodiversity.
Reason: In the interests of nature conservation and biodiversity.
Reason: In order to ensure that adequate protection is afforded to the existing trees to be retained on site.
Reason: To minimise any environmental pollution from the development.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory standard of development which is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and in the interests of noise abatement and general residential amenity.
Reason: In order to provide an adequate provision of locally equipped play in the absence of any alternatives within the immediate locality.
(a) Timing of works; (b) Methods used for all channel, bankside, water margin works; (c) Protection of areas of ecological sensitivity and importance; (d) The means of access for construction traffic; (e) The loading and unloading of plant and materials; (f) The storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development; (g) Wheel washing facilities; (h) Measures to control the emission of dust and dirt during construction; (i) A scheme for recycling/disposing of waste resulting from demolition and construction works. Any changes to these components require the express written consent of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall be implemented as approved.
Reason: To minimise any environmental pollution from the development.
Reason: To minimise any environmental pollution from the development.
Reason: To minimise any environmental pollution from the development.
a) A pollution remediation strategy giving full details of the remediation measures required and how they are to be undertaken. b) A verification plan providing details of the data that will be collected in order to demonstrate that the works set out in the remediation strategy are complete and identifying any requirements for longer-term monitoring of pollutant linkages, maintenance and arrangements for contingency action. Any changes to these components require the express written consent of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall be implemented as approved.
Reason: To minimise any environmental pollution from the development. |
|
Minutes: Application
The Principal Planning Officer recommended approval.
The Principal Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
The replacement dwelling is located on a similar footprint to existing achieving a satisfactory relationship with the built format of Wigton.
The scale and appearance of the dwelling is considered acceptable.
The proposal will not significantly impact on the amenity of existing properties.
The applicant has provided a plan that shows onsite parking can be achieved.
The application site lies within Flood Zone 2 and 3. The proposal seeks a replacement dwelling with the applicant fully aware of the flood risk and has included mitigation measures into the redesign of the dwelling.
Members noted the representations received in respect of the application, the main grounds of which were set out in the report.
Councillor D Wilson moved that the application be approved as per the recommendations from officers. This was seconded by Councillor T Annison.
A vote was taken on the motion. The vote in favour of approval was unanimous. The motion was carried.
Decision
Approved
Conditions
Reason: In order to comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
2017-104-10C - Site Layout and Streetscene (amendment received 19 January 2018) 2017-104-11B revision B - Elevations and Floor Plans (amendment received 13 December 2017) 17-104-12A Location Plan (amendment received 19 January 2018) Application Form - Section 10 Boundary Treatments Scoping Survey Flood Risk Assessment
Reason: In order to ensure that the development is carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans and any material and non-material alterations to the scheme are properly considered.
Reason: To ensure an acceptable standard of highway access during the construction and operational use of the site, in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S2 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety.
Reason: To ensure a minimum standard of access, parking and turning provision when the development is brought into use.
Reason: To minimise highway danger for construction or operational traffic and for the avoidance of doubt.
Reason: To minimise any risk arising from any possible contamination from the development to the local environment in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S30 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: In order to enhance the appearance of the development and minimise the impact of the development in the locality.
Reason: To safeguard the habitat of bats in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S35 of the Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1), Adopted July 2014.
Reason: To reduce the risk of flooding to the proposed development and future occupants in compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy S29 of the Allerdale Local Plan, (Part 1), Adopted July 2014. |
|
Minutes: Application
The Principal Planning Officer recommended approval.
The Principal Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
It is considered the proposal would not have a detrimental impact upon nearby neighbouring properties.
It is considered the proposal is appropriate in scale and design and would not adversely alter the appearance of the existing building.
No concerns.
Members noted the representations received in respect of the application, the main grounds of which were set out in the report.
Councillor M Grainger moved that the application be approved as per the recommendations from officers. This was seconded by Councillor D Wilson.
A vote was taken on the motion. The vote in favour of approval was unanimous. The motion was carried.
Decision
Approved
Conditions
Reason: In order to comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
JSR01 - Proposed Elevations JSR02 - Block Plan and Location Plan JSR03 - Detailed plan of balcony
Reason: In order to ensure that the development is carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans and any material and non-material alterations to the scheme are properly considered. |