Decision Maker: Development Panel
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Councillor M Jenkinson left the meeting at 3.46 pm.
The Planning Officer recommended approval.
The Planning Officer outlined the application and detailed the main issues within the report as follows:
The extraction system and flue will replace the existing system that is not fit for purpose and without the benefit of planning permission.
The proposals will provide the functionality to achieve the necessary odour control within noise limits with minimal impact on residential amenity and with an improvement on the current situation.
There will be some visual impact from the proposals. However, the impact is not considered to be less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed buildings and Conservation Area. The benefits of the system in safeguarding residential amenity from odour and sustaining the business are considered to outweigh any harm. The impact on the enjoyment of the Public Right of Way is considered not to be significant.
A flue of similar dimensions was previously approved by the Council and installed on the same elevation in 1999. This has since been removed following the flooding and re-occupation of the building in 2015
Members noted the representations received in respect of the application, the main grounds of which were set out in the report.
Councillor R Munby moved that the application be approved as per the officer’s recommendation. This was seconded by Councillor M Grainger.
A vote was taken on the motion. The vote in favour was unanimous. The motion was carried.
Reason: In order to comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
002 Rev A Existing & Proposed Rear and Side Elevations/Site Plan/Block
Plan (amended plan 14/5/2018)
Aspava Layout Option 1 (amended plan 14/5/2018)
Reason: In order to ensure that the development is carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans and any material and non-material alterations to the scheme are properly considered.
Reason; In order to minimise visual impact
Report author: Kelly Hampson
Publication date: 29/06/2018
Date of decision: 26/06/2018
Decided at meeting: 26/06/2018 - Development Panel